Step 02 of 8 2-3 weeks· advanced
Step 2: Strategy Decision (per Pipeline Category)
Not every pipeline needs the same approach. Categorize each into rewrite, tool-assisted translation, redesign, retire, or replace-with-platform-feature.
Recommended prompts
Use one of these to do the work in your IDE
Open the template to read it in full. Click Copy prompt to grab it (with your stack values pre-filled where they apply) — then paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or wherever you build.
Recommended skills
Drop these into Claude Code for this phase
Skills auto-trigger on the right kind of request. Install once; they apply to every prompt that fits.
Recommended MCP configs
Wire these tools into Claude Code first
MCP servers give Claude Code direct access to external systems (Jira, browsers, databases). Configure once.
When you're done
Verify these in your own work before moving on
This is a checklist for you to mentally tick off in your repo and IDE — the site doesn't track it, you do.
- Every pipeline categorized into a strategy (A/B/C/D/E)
- Retirement list confirmed — pipelines NOT migrating
- Tool-assisted translation tooling chosen (if applicable)
- Replace-with-platform candidates identified
- High-level effort estimate per strategy
- Risk register updated
Common pitfalls
What goes wrong at this step
- One-size-fits-all strategy — different pipelines need different approaches
- Skipping the retirement list — migrating dead pipelines is the easiest waste to eliminate
- Picking automated translation without piloting — tools vary in quality
- Underestimating "rethink" pipelines — "while we're modernizing, let's also..." is a project killer